Pierre Boisrond has followed soccer and the World Cup
closely for many years and also writes for other websites. We at PWC are proud to have him as
a columnist. He will share his views about the past, present and future of
the World Cup.
Read earlier columns
Bielsa: An undeserved second chance
It is clearly evident that Marcelo Bielsa will again be the coach of Argentina. Well, perhaps Bielsa deserves a second chance
after what he achieved during the World Cup qualifiers. However, we all know what does matter at the end is for the coach
and his staff to win the World Cup trophy. If this is so, Bielsa choked big time and for this reason, he should have just resigned
instead of lobbying for a second chance.
Why giving him a second chance? Why? After such a horrible display of Argentina in Korea-Japan, this is not acceptable at
the highest level. Alfio “El Coco” Basile did not get a second chance after USA 1994; Daniel Alberto Pasarella did not get a
second chance after France 1994. Both did better than Bielsa. Somehow, Grondona and his allies find a way to bring Bielsa
back to conduct the Albiceleste. Why not choosing Bianchi or Pekerman? Why should the Argentine fans have to see Bielsa
going up and down on the sideline again? The world has seen enough of Bielsa! We have seen him against Nigeria! We have
seen him destroy the pride of Argentina against England! We have seen him succumb against Sweden after refusing to
change his coaching tactics. Why should the fans, specifically, the people of Argentina, have to revive these painful summer
memories? Definitely, there must be a way to find someone to replace Grondona as the head of AFA. Grondona and Bielsa
are the cause of Argentina’s failure. He (Grondona) could not even find a way to resist FIFA after refusing to retire the #10
Jersey of Diego Armando Maradona, El mas grande de todo los tiempos. Instead, we have seen a “desconocido” Ortega
with that number that clearly symbolizes greatness in Argentina.
Bielsa stated that he needs revenge. What kind of revenge he is talking about? A revenge to deny the talented Riquelme
(Romy) out of the lineup again; or a revenge to negate Saviola, el Pibito; is it a revenge to humiliate another player as he did to
Gabriel Omar Batistuta when he substituted him in his last game for the national side? Is this that kind of revenge Bielsa is
talking about? Is it a revenge for him to continue with his tactics of aligning only one striker? Instead of bringing Crespo in for
another player against Sweden, Bielsa instead humiliated Batigol by making him suffer on the Bench. Why not Bati &
Crespo? Why not? Let’s hope that the revenge Bielsa is conjugating will force Argentina to play against the Europeans; If
not, It will be all over before 2006.
After what we have seen in this World Cup, Bielsa should have never been given a second chance. Perhaps, this is the right
approach for AFA since a coach’s performance cannot be only judged on three games. However, these games are three
crucial World Cup games. Coaches from the powerhouses are expected to bring the trophy home. If not, then their jobs are
over. Most coaches ended it by resigning. It is very surprising that Big Phil of Brazil after winning the World Cup decided not
to accept a renewal of his contract. Bielsa should have just followed Big Phil. However, the same Big Phil stated that he has
used Bielsa’s tactics to win the World Cup with Brazil. Well, I can’t see the logics in Big Phil’s statement.
Well, no one argues that Bielsa is not an excellent coach; however, after four years with a team full of superstars and a first
round exit in the World Cup, Bielsa should have been on his way out. Now, Bielsa is about to start his final chapter, at least I
I can only hope that Marcelo Bielsa will learn from the past World Cup. I can only hope that Bielsa will change his style of
coaching if he wants to earn his respect back in the world of football. This past World Cup was a nightmare for the
Argentines, and I can only wish that won’t happen in 2006 where the Germans will definitely be in charge. It is time for
Argentina to bring the trophy back to the Rio Platense region. The time is long overdue. Argentina needs another Maradona
or Kempes, two football masters, indeed.
It seems that it takes a period of 20 years for the appearance of a football genius. Will that genius be the talented Juan Roman
Riquelme? Will that genius be Andres D’Alessandro? Whoever that genius might be, Argentina does have the talents to win
the 2006 World Cup trophy. Now, the only question that we’ll have to ask ourselves is whether or not Marcelo Bielsa, an
excellent coach who can’t rise to the occasion, won’t hamper this process again.
I wish Bielsa all the best. Even though I think he should have resigned, I should also say that he did bring the total football
back to Argentina. He did an excellent job with the national team during the qualifiers, but failed to bring back the ultimate
prize. This time, he must rise to the challenge and there won’t be any more sympathy for him if the same 2002 results reoccur
in 2006. Somehow, I’ll manage to accept Bielsa as the coach. However, I still believe that Argentina’s coach should have
been Carlos Bianchi, El Virrey.
Info on how
the World Cup was founded and about the trophy as well.
on every match in every tournament.
Interesting columns about the past, present and future of the World Cup.
with appearances in the World Cup. Detailed info on every country.
of many of the most influential players in history.
An A-Z collection
of strange and different stories in World Cup history.
A big collection
of various statistics and records.
since it was introduced in 1966.
knowledge about the WC. Three different levels. No prizes, just for fun.
lots of stuff. For instance Best Goals, Best Players and Best Matches.
of links to other soccer sites with World Cup connection.
and buttons for you to link to us if you want.
A little information
on who keeps this site available.